OCTOPUS ENERGY & CORPORATE ENTITY FRAUD

OCTOPUS ENERGY

OCTOPUS ENERGY, a corporate entity which, as with every other CORPS, including up to the self-titled corporate entity of Charles III R, requires the WET INK SIGNATURE of the Party's for any agreement. Any (sic) "CONTRACT" which is not properly executed - wet signed and with mutual consideration is a fraudulent instrument. e-Contracts are, by definition thro the deliberate omission is a fraud.

01-SEP-25 Baron David Ward is a repository for many of the Affidavit and Liens which all aim to disabuse the misled of the actual FACTS the liens:

A look at any of the (sic) laws "signed in to law" shows, the CORPS requirement for either a wet-signature or a Seal on any instrument in order to 'execute' it. As no man has granted CIIIR, his antecedents, predecessors or successors any Power of Attorney there is no authority granted to say any man must follow the Corporate laws. No man could ever grant Power of Attorney over another in perpetuity meaning each man would have to agree to each and every corporate officer created by CIIIR and the like. A claim of Power of Attorney without execution of the contract is fraud. A claim of perpetual Power of Attorney is fraud. All is fraud under their own rules as there is an absence of mutual consideration and the consideration favours only the corporation, and never reveals to any man, the absence of authority to create any law by which any man outwith the corporation must follow.

Any corporation that applies to HMTCS for any WRIT or WARRANT can be in CTONTEMPT of COURT by CONCEALING the Subject Access Request (SAR) and through such concealment when, providing false information within any application to HMCTS. Punishment for Contempt of Court can be fines or imprisonment. These frauds also fall under the Terrorism ACt, Companies Act, Bills of Exchange Act, GDPR Act and the the Fraud Act.

20:24 It could be coincidence HMCTS delays censuring OCTOPUS ENERGY which allows OE to have enforcers attack your property.

The alledged courts case number is not recognised by the Ministry of Justice who oversee HMCTS as evidenced by SAR requests which come back "CASE NOT FOUND. The alledged courts refuse to show the paperwork submitted--in direct breach of CPR including 83.2 & CPR 83.13(8)(a)

Laffably, CPR rules are published under the auspices of the corporate entity of "JUSTICE.GOV"

Under CPR 83.2 & CPR 83.13(8)(a) A warrant of control may only be issued following a valid court order...which must be issued and sealed by a court officer. It is essential that this warrant is signed and properly sealed to be valid...without the proper court seal and signature, the warrant cannot be deemed to have been lawfully issued, and thus cannot support any action of enforcement.

There own CPR Rules 83.8 state they must provide information that is requested. "1) If the creditor or debtor serves notice on the enforcement agent or enforcement officer requiring reasonable information about the execution of a writ or warrant, the enforcement agent or enforcement officer must send such information to the creditor or debtor within 7 days of service of the notice."

-apr-25 SUBMISSION OF SUBJECT ACCESS REQUEST No2

Meantime, OCTOPUS galvanises, hatching a plot and aided and abetted by non other than HMCTS produces a fraudulent Warrant--again unliveried and unexecuted properly. All are asked for proof of the court case and conceal it--the case file, the proof of any debt non of which is forthcoming.

13-APR-25 HMCTS LOCKSMITHS HASTE OCTOPUS AND UNIDENTIFIED BREAK IN TO PROVIDE OCTOPUS AND OTHERS FRAUDULENT GAIN

There are no signatures, no contracts nothing for these acts of in terrorem fraud. No one's property is safe.

Since the Non-COMPLIANCE with SAR 2 was submitted to the ICO, they have granted OCTOPUS yet more time to respond and not surprisingly Octopus have not done so. 04-SEP-25 we referred Octopus DISCLOSURE CONCEALMENT back to the ICO and now wait again to hear.

Links to BDW's AFFIDAVIT and EXHIBITs